Special guest speaker Dmytro Orlov, Professor of Materials Science at Lund University, gave a captivating talk on inductive inference, a systematic method of scientific thinking that was presented in a 1964 paper.(1) This highly controversial concept (at the time and even today) posits that 3 steps—developing alternative hypotheses, devising experiments with alternative possible outcomes that exclude one or more of the hypotheses, and performing the experiments to generate a

Discover how Dr. Andreas Forsvall's groundbreaking journey in prostate cancer diagnostics led to safer procedures.

Maybe I’d be better off doing something else.    Maybe, after all, I’m not that smart. The new year has just begun, and Bob starts it enthusiastically, recharged after the holiday break. He’s determined to follow his list of New Year’s resolutions with renewed energy, now that he’s back at work. He believes that he can do this and that this year will finally be different. A little extra effort, a little more discipline, and Bob,   you’ll finally become a good-enough scientist

Human-AI connection in a digital future. Image generated with ChatGPT 5.2. With the magazine Time naming “The Architects of AI” as person of the year (1), what better moment to reflect on how AI is reshaping us as humans, and how this transformation echoes through the way we approach scientific work and understanding? Don’t worry: we are not here to deliver another impersonal or unrelatable AI monologue; rather we hope to build, collectively, an honest reflection on a topic

Special guest speaker Dmytro Orlov, Professor of Materials Science at Lund University, gave a captivating talk on inductive inference, a systematic method of scientific thinking that was presented in a 1964 paper.(1) This highly controversial concept (at the time and even today) posits that 3 steps—developing alternative hypotheses, devising experiments with alternative possible outcomes that exclude one or more of the hypotheses, and performing the experiments to generate a

Dr. Silvia Marchesi is a postdoctoral researcher, anesthesiologist, and intensive care practitioner at Skåne University Hospital, Malmö. The morning light filtered through the windows as Dr. Silvia Marchesi adjusted her schedule one more time. As a postdoctoral researcher, anesthesiologist, and intensive care practitioner at Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, she had strategically chosen this time for our videocall —early enough to minimize the risk of being called away to an

Building on last month’s meeting of the Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club on good research practices, Daniela Grassi, PhD presented “Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course” by Heise et al. (1). Her discussion introduced some practical measures toward incorporating robust research practices.

Rewriting grant applications can be demanding, often because of formatting differences across funders. In our campaign, we investigated how researchers feel about this process, how formatting affects their workload, and what a possible pathway toward harmonization might look like.

In the latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea event, AdvanSci hosted a game night that brought science and fun together.

In the latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club, Magnus Pettersson, senior biostatistican at Statistikkonsulterna Väst, led a discussion about power and sample size estimations.

Building on last month’s meeting of the Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club on good research practices, Daniela Grassi, PhD presented “Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course” by Heise et al. (1). Her discussion introduced some practical measures toward incorporating robust research practices.

In the latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club, Muhammed Shahbaz, PhD led a discussion based on Simon Schwab's paper "Ten simple rules for good research practice" (1).

Systematic reviews aim to synthesize scientific knowledge, but growing concerns about research integrity threaten their fundamental purpose.

As AdvanSci Research Solutions celebrates its third birthday on January 27th, we're taking a moment to reflect on our journey and celebrate the milestones that have shaped our company since 2022. What began as two PhD graduates' vision to improve the quality of biomedical research has grown into a thriving service provider supporting researchers in Sweden and beyond.

The latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club meeting explored the critical role of statistical power in research design.

How does a busy cardiothoracic surgeon find time to secure major research funding? Dr. Igor Zindovic shares his story. "Application writing demands a whole lot of time," Igor explained. "With AdvanSci’s help, I could use that time for my clinical work instead, and the applications I submitted were far better than I could have done on my own."

Are all published research findings accurate?

ReproducibiliTea club to discuss the role of AI in scientific integrity

AdvanSci Research Solutions seeking beta testers for the new Electronic Lab Assistant (ERA)