Special guest speaker Dmytro Orlov, Professor of Materials Science at Lund University, gave a captivating talk on inductive inference, a systematic method of scientific thinking that was presented in a 1964 paper.(1) This highly controversial concept (at the time and even today) posits that 3 steps—developing alternative hypotheses, devising experiments with alternative possible outcomes that exclude one or more of the hypotheses, and performing the experiments to generate a

Building on last month’s meeting of the Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club on good research practices, Daniela Grassi, PhD presented “Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course” by Heise et al. (1). Her discussion introduced some practical measures toward incorporating robust research practices.

In the latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea event, AdvanSci hosted a game night that brought science and fun together.

Building on last month’s meeting of the Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club on good research practices, Daniela Grassi, PhD presented “Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course” by Heise et al. (1). Her discussion introduced some practical measures toward incorporating robust research practices.

In the latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club, Muhammed Shahbaz, PhD led a discussion based on Simon Schwab's paper "Ten simple rules for good research practice" (1).

Systematic reviews aim to synthesize scientific knowledge, but growing concerns about research integrity threaten their fundamental purpose.

The latest Lund Biomedicine ReproducibiliTea Journal Club meeting explored the critical role of statistical power in research design.

Are all published research findings accurate?

ReproducibiliTea club to discuss the role of AI in scientific integrity